commit f306d601a1eab561815a0a1e6dc2cd3d857d4f05
author Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> Mon Aug 01 15:10:40 2022 -0400
committer Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> Mon Aug 01 22:53:17 2022 +0200
tree 24a3827cb1a9bbf6cd6f2a73af9ec4ec2e4dd097
parent cd45ff66cfdb8d4417e159aaae59060dc232e810

related tdf#150197: SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn should SetListFormat

sw code should all use the ne ListFormat behaviour instead of
the legacy Prefix/Suffix numbering format.

There is another case in sd - but I'm a little leery
about whether SD really supports the new ListFormat for numbering...

Change-Id: I8dc0e14f5bc24d448a2551dba70b3dcce18273b0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137682
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com>

sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx

diff --git a/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx b/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
index 2e885ef..d5b04b0 100644
--- a/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/uibase/wrtsh/wrtsh1.cxx
@@ -1511,8 +1511,7 @@ void SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn(bool bNum)
                    aFormat.SetBulletChar( numfunc::GetBulletChar(static_cast<sal_uInt8>(nLevel)));
                    aFormat.SetNumberingType(SVX_NUM_CHAR_SPECIAL);
                    // #i93908# clear suffix for bullet lists
                    aFormat.SetPrefix(OUString());
                    aFormat.SetSuffix(OUString());
                    aFormat.SetListFormat("", "", nLevel);
                }
                aNumRule.Set(o3tl::narrowing<sal_uInt16>(nLevel), aFormat);
            }
@@ -1570,8 +1569,7 @@ void SwWrtShell::NumOrBulletOn(bool bNum)
                aFormat.SetBulletChar( numfunc::GetBulletChar(nLvl) );
                aFormat.SetNumberingType(SVX_NUM_CHAR_SPECIAL);
                // #i93908# clear suffix for bullet lists
                aFormat.SetPrefix(OUString());
                aFormat.SetSuffix(OUString());
                aFormat.SetListFormat("", "", nLvl);
            }

            // #i95907#